On Tuesday, throughout a go to of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Mr Trump mentioned: “If we can get a beautiful area to resettle people, permanently, in nice homes where they can be happy and not be shot and not be killed and not be knifed to death like what’s happening in Gaza.”
He drew world condemnation for his feedback, which included: “The US will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it too. We’ll own it.”
When questioned, Mr Trump mentioned he did envision a “long-term ownership position” and described Gaza’s future as “the Riviera of the Middle East”.
2:48
Trump: ‘We’ll personal Gaza’
However talking on Wednesday, White Home press secretary Karoline Leavitt appeared to contradict Mr Trump’s phrases and claimed he had mentioned it might all the time be non permanent.
“The president has made it clear that they need to be temporarily relocated out of Gaza for the rebuilding of this effort,” she mentioned to reporters.
She continued: “Again, it’s a demolition site right now. It’s not a liveable place for any human being. And I think it’s actually quite evil to suggest that people should live in such dire conditions.”
Ms Leavitt additionally added that Mr Trump “has not committed” to sending troops to Gaza – however she didn’t rule it out.
Picture:
White Home press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Pic: AP
‘A large row again’
He mentioned: “I think what we heard there, reading between the lines, was a massive row back.
“She mentioned that the relocation of Palestinians from Gaza whereas the territory is rebuilt could be non permanent, and she or he mentioned the president was ‘very clear’ about that.
“Well he wasn’t very clear about that. He was very clear that it would be permanent. Indeed, he repeated this idea that they would be permanently relocated to ‘somewhere beautiful’, he said on many occasions yesterday.
“And so whereas she did not acknowledge that there was a shift in place between yesterday and right now, it was implicit in every thing that she mentioned.”
‘Deeply uncertain’
0:48
Ex-Israel PM: Gaza plan ‘deeply uncertain’
He mentioned: “I cannot judge it, there are many in Israel who are really excited about it but it seems to me deeply doubtful whether it can ever fly.
“It is most likely intentionally or subconsciously used as a leverage upon the Arab leaders to shake them up and to start out to consider how they will contribute to keep away from the necessity for America to intervene. I feel that is extra possible an evidence for the entire story.”
Spreaker
This content material is supplied by Spreaker, which can be utilizing cookies and different applied sciences.
To indicate you this content material, we want your permission to make use of cookies.
You should use the buttons under to amend your preferences to allow Spreaker cookies or to permit these cookies simply as soon as.
You’ll be able to change your settings at any time through the Privateness Choices.
Sadly we’ve got been unable to confirm in case you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content material you should utilize the button under to permit Spreaker cookies for this session solely.
Allow Cookies
Permit Cookies As soon as
It was not clear whether or not Mr Trump was severe along with his proposal or just taking an excessive place as a bargaining technique, as he has performed up to now.
Whereas Mr Trump’s feedback have thrust the politics and way forward for Gaza into the headlines, on the bottom, almost 16 months of Israeli bombardment has devastated the coastal enclave and killed greater than 47,000 individuals, in line with its Hamas-run well being ministry.
The offensive adopted the 7 October Hamas assaults in 2023, through which round 1,200 individuals have been killed in southern Israel and about 250 individuals have been taken hostage.