COMMENT #1: Marty, they’re beginning to take heed to you. This decision even mentions the Neocons for the primary time.
Sustain the nice combat
PH
COMMENT #2: Marty, Attention-grabbing bipartisan Home decision mentioning the neocons and saying no extra. Your message appears to be getting by way of.
Nicely finished
We will see.
T
REPLY: Ultimately, we’re beginning to hear the appropriate phrases. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who’s a libertarian-leaning Republican, got here out to introduce a decision towards U.S. army intervention overseas, posted on the social media web site X on Monday that he would introduce such a decision on Tuesday. He mentioned:
“This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution,” Massie mentioned. “I’m introducing a bipartisan War Powers Resolution tomorrow to prohibit our involvement. I invite all members of Congress to cosponsor this resolution.”
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) additionally mentioned that he would co-lead the decision with Massie and that the decision can be privileged, which means that this designation circumvents the management thereby forcing a full Home vote.
“No war in Iran. It’s time for every member to go on record. Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?” Khanna mentioned in a put up on X. “I am proud to co-lead this bipartisan War Powers Resolution with Rep. Massie that is privileged and must receive a vote.”
Any member who doesn’t help this must be pushed from workplace as a pawn of the military-complex institution that advantages from wars.
