My wheelchair was broken when travelling on a long-haul flight that used each Aer Lingus and Singapore Air. The wheels have been broken on the way in which out, with the body badly broken on the way in which again. Each airways are ignoring me, and I haven’t got a chair I can use within the meantime.Monique
I discovered Monique on-line after I noticed her tweeting each airways, asking them to take accountability for the injury that had been brought about on her flights between Dublin and Singapore – and noticed she was being met with a wall of silence.
A part of these flights have been operated by Aer Lingus (Heathrow to Dublin, and Amsterdam to Dublin), so whereas it was initially unclear which airline brought about the primary injury, I had to determine who held final duty.
On the outbound flight, the wheels of the wheelchair have been broken considerably – these wheels have been valued at £1,800, and Monique despatched footage to the producer, which warned her to not use them as a result of they’d been rendered unsafe.
It obtained worse on her return flight. When Monique arrived at Dublin, she was instructed the wheelchair had been misplaced, and he or she needed to go away the airport with out it.
For somebody who makes use of a wheelchair, to be instructed to depart with out it was completely devastating.
“I am leaving the airport without my legs, essentially. I cannot comprehend this. This is the chair I married in, graduated in, brought my baby home in, have taken across five continents. It lets me live my life,” she mentioned.
The wheelchair was finally discovered on the runway and returned to her the following day. In addition to additional injury to the wheels, the body had deep scratches and gouges, which appeared to recommend that it was dragged throughout one thing laborious and tough (resembling concrete) whereas the other way up.
A few of these are deep sufficient to have absolutely penetrated the powder coating and scratched the naked steel beneath, once more damaging the integrity of the body.
In whole, each airways had brought about round £4,000 price of injury.
When it got here to restore, a number of impartial corporations agreed it was a write-off.
Picture:
The fibre glass of the wheels have been damaged, making them harmful to make use of
The affect
Monique instructed me she is an ambulant wheelchair consumer, which suggests she has restricted mobility strolling, nevertheless it causes vital ache, frequent dislocations, joint swelling and exhaustion.
As a result of the injury occurred on the outbound flight, she needed to restrict what she may do on vacation.
When the wheelchair went lacking, she was left hysterical and “sobbed while filling in the form”.
“I usually have independence for moving myself to the bathroom, and had to get other people to help me. I couldn’t go do what I wanted to at home with my child. I haven’t been able to do the activities that I usually can,” she mentioned.
“It’s causing sleepless nights because I can’t afford to replace it, but I need it to protect my health and wellbeing, to continue working and to have access to my community.”
Picture:
Monique despatched images of the wheels to the producer – they warned her to not use them
What occurred subsequent?
I may see Monique’s ticket was booked with Singapore Airways, which had then subcontracted out a part of the flights to Aer Lingus.
Below the Client Rights Act 2015, you may declare for injury from an airline if providers – together with baggage dealing with – weren’t carried out with “reasonable care and skill”. As a result of Monique had paid Singapore Airways for the flight, initially I assumed they might be in the end accountable as a result of that is the corporate she had entered right into a contract with. This turned out to not be fairly right, however extra on that under.
Utilizing a wheelchair shouldn’t be a luxurious: it’s a necessity that enables somebody to stay and go about their each day life. Initially, Monique was supplied £540 by Singapore to compensate her for the injury to the wheels, an arguably pitiful quantity to exchange a £4,000 piece of important tools.
She was then instructed by Aer Lingus that whereas it will cowl the price of the body, she needed to pay upfront and submit receipts – and crucially, the airline mentioned it will not cowl injury to the wheels.
I am unsure many people may afford to pay hundreds of kilos on the promise of being reimbursed. (It is price noting that final 12 months, each airways reported an working revenue within the tons of of tens of millions.)
What occurred after that…
Singapore Airways instructed me it “sincerely apologises to the customer for the distress and inconvenience caused by the damaged wheelchair”.
It added: “We are committed to providing the necessary assistance and have been in contact with the customer on this matter.”
But it surely mentioned that – regardless of my preliminary intuition of it carrying all legal responsibility – Aer Lingus, as “the operating carrier for the final flight segment”, can be coping with any declare for the body injury.
Picture:
Pic: iStock
After numerous backwards and forwards between us/them/Monique, Aer Lingus dropped the necessity for her to pay for the body up entrance, and agreed to pay for it to get replaced – as soon as she offered proof that it couldn’t be repaired.
Some weeks later, a spokesperson instructed us: “Aer Lingus is pleased to have closed this matter directly with our customer.
“Having not too long ago obtained the mandatory documentation, Aer Lingus has funded the worth of a brand new wheelchair for our buyer. We sincerely apologise for the inconvenience attributable to injury to their wheelchair in transit.”
Monique has now received the money from both airlines – but she isn’t celebrating.
She told me: “Finally, I’m exhausted, and by the point a brand new wheelchair is made I’ll have misplaced as much as 5 months of my life. It has been hell.
“Any victory feels hollow given how being without it has disrupted my life, the sheer effort I had to put in to get a resolution.
“It is a decision that got here after an inexplicably complicated battle after they’ve had so many extra assets to throw at this than me, for what’s a relatively tiny payout.. I must fly once more quickly for work and I’m dreading it. Disabled individuals are second class residents on flights.”
Picture:
Pic: iStock
What are the compensation guidelines for mobility tools?
Safety for passengers within the UK who want mobility tools is, sadly, pretty poor. Below Civil Aviation Authority guidelines, airways are liable for injury to mobility tools, however compensation is commonly restricted to £1,300.
Whereas passengers who use mobility tools ought to think about taking out extra insurance coverage, on this occasion Monique’s insurance coverage refused to pay up and mentioned she wanted to be reimbursed by the airways that had brought about the injury.
In 2023, a marketing campaign group referred to as Rights on Flights launched a draft of the Assisted Air Journey Act – if handed, this is able to strengthen rights for disabled passengers. The incapacity equality charity Scope has additionally referred to as for airways and airports to be fined in the event that they fail to stop injury to mobility tools.
But, whereas particular laws is proscribed in actual help, it was disappointing to see Singapore Airways and Aer Lingus be sluggish to answer Monique – morally, paying up and doing so rapidly is the precise factor to do.
This function shouldn’t be supposed as monetary recommendation – the intention is to present an outline of the issues it is best to take into consideration. Submit your dilemma or client dispute through:
WhatsApp hereOr e mail [email protected] with the topic line “Money Problem”
