Decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platform Compound is dealing with calls to onboard extra danger managers in response to a lately accepted governance proposal made by present supervisor Gauntlet.
Throwing its hat into the ring as a possible candidate, Chainrisk is asking for extra transparency amongst COMP delegates and their negotiations, with a reply even pointing to an unlabeled handle which may be linked to Gauntlet.
In what DeFi commentator Togbe is asking “some of the griftiest stuff I’ve ever seen from Gauntlet,” Gauntlet’s proposal is for Compound to make use of competitor Morpho (for which Gauntlet can also be a service supplier) to launch new markets on the Polygon community.
Gauntlet, nevertheless, presents the transfer as a win-win-win for Compound, Morpho, and Polygon, a method to capitalize on a possible hole available in the market following a cooling off of relations between Polygon and Aave, DeFi’s largest lending platform.
Aave, which represents over a 3rd of Polygon’s complete worth locked (TVL), in response to DeFiLlama, threatened to depart the community in response to a controversial proposal to make use of bridge funds for yield farming, additionally through Morpho.
Aave governance delegate Marc Zeller took to X to spotlight the perceived battle of curiosity within the proposal, characterizing the proposal as “subsidiz[ing] a competitor’s growth that’s been eroding their market share every quarter.”
He additionally provided to wager $50,000 on whether or not the transfer would show to be a profitable consequence for COMP holders.
Nevertheless, Gauntlet has defended the proposal, citing points corresponding to “ongoing lawsuits, Labs hands tied, market share eroding” as causes for such a transfer, in addition to stressing the proposal is just not self-serving in highlighting the price construction, and the truth that Gauntlet’s Morpho earnings are already capped.
Whereas Gauntlet’s proposal states that “Compound DAO will be the sole owner of the vaults and will accrue all revenue generated during the joint incentives trial program,” it provides that, in future, and topic to DAO approval, “Gauntlet may introduce a fee-splitter contract as revenue share for the work Gauntlet performs as the vaults’ Curator.”
Gauntlet’s Vice President of Progress, Nick Cannon, has hit again at criticism on X, which he calls “approved comms” from a “worried” Aave camp, additionally claiming that Gauntlet was censored throughout its time at Aave.
Polygon Labs’ CEO additionally claims that Aave pressured groups throughout governance votes.
This isn’t the primary time that Gauntlet, Aave, and Morpho have come into battle. Except for the current “Polygon(e)” controversy, tensions flared final yr when Gauntlet walked away from its function at Aave and commenced working with Morpho.
Shortly after, the protocols argued over their respective approaches to danger when customers had been liquidated throughout a depeg of Renzo’s ezETH.
Whereas the spat could appear to be nothing greater than two units of former colleagues bickering on the timeline, sustaining wholesome and purposeful DAO governance processes is a severe enterprise.
A number of precedents have been set by an absence of consideration to DAO voting, such because the $25 million governance “attack” suffered by Compound final July. Beforehand, in 2022, Compound’s $830 million ether (ETH) market was bricked for every week when a proposal had unintended penalties.
Elsewhere, Maker DAO made emergency modifications to borrowing restrictions in response to rumors of a takeover plot simply final month.
DeFi doom and gloom
The newest crypto sell-off continues to pile on the stress in DeFi; the sector has seen TVL plunge by over a 3rd, down from its current peak of $138 billion on December 17 to simply underneath $88 billion right now.
Even these pulling the strings had been omitted of pocket, because the Donald Trump-backed World Liberty Monetary is reportedly down unhealthy, cursing ETH identical to everybody else.
As monetary markets took a nosedive yesterday, the broader crypto ecosystem racked up virtually $900 million value of liquidations, in response to information from Coinglass.
In the meantime, over in DeFi, customers monitored one whale’s dicey 65,000 ETH ($123 million) place with bated breath, fearing its liquidation may trigger an on-chain cascade.
