A Los Angeles Superior Court docket decide on Wednesday denied a request from the Rose Bowl Working Co. and the Metropolis of Pasadena in search of a brief restraining order of their try and hold UCLA soccer video games on the Rose Bowl, saying these entities had not demonstrated an emergency that may necessitate such an motion.
However decide James C. Chalfant recommended the plaintiffs’ attorneys search discovery data concerning the college’s discussions with SoFi Stadium and file a movement for a preliminary injunction.
Nima Mohebbi, an legal professional representing the Rose Bowl Working Co. and the Metropolis of Pasadena, stated he had filed a public data request in an try to assemble details about these discussions and was happy with the decide’s statements.
“Even though he found that there was no immediate emergency,” Mohebbi stated, “he made very clear in a lot of his statements that there’s irreparable harm, that UCLA has an obligation to play at the Rose Bowl through 2044 and we’re very confident in our facts of this case. So I think all in, we feel very, very good.”
Maurice Suh, an legal professional representing UCLA, declined to remark.
When a UCLA legal professional contended through the roughly 80-minute courtroom session that the college’s relationship with the Rose Bowl was breaking down, Chalfant stated, “I don’t know why UCLA can’t just show up and play football at the Rose Bowl. You don’t need to talk to them at all.”
Chalfant stated he didn’t agree with the UCLA attorneys’ rivalry that the Rose Bowl lease amounted to a private providers contract for which particular efficiency — basically an order compelling the Bruins to stay tenants — was not obtainable. The decide stated particular efficiency could possibly be obtainable in a scenario involving an precise breach or an anticipatory breach of the contract.
UCLA, which has performed its residence soccer video games on the Rose Bowl since 1982, has publicly acknowledged that it’s evaluating its choices for a future soccer residence. Attorneys representing UCLA shook their heads when the decide requested them in the event that they supposed to terminate the settlement.
Rose Bowl officers have filed litigation supposed to compel the Bruins to honor a lease that runs by the 2043 season, saying that financial damages wouldn’t be sufficient to offset the lack of their anchor tenant.
