Heathrow Airport’s enlargement plans might lastly go forward after virtually 20 years of debates and delays.
Its potential revival comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves indicated she would overrule environmental objections to permit London’s largest airport to hold out its plans with the intention to prioritise financial progress.
She is predicted to make use of a speech this week to assist the enlargement, in addition to related plans for Gatwick and Luton.
However what precisely does the airport wish to do, and why has it proved so controversial?
Heathrow needs a brand new runway
The west London hub needs to construct a 3rd runway to the north-west of the present two, which it says would allow a further 260,000 flights per 12 months and “allow Britain as a sovereign nation to compete more effectively for trade”.
Its plans additionally embrace a brand new terminal constructing to the west of Terminal 5 and the eventual demolition of Terminal 3 to make manner for a collection of latest satellite tv for pc terminals and extra public transport.
Regardless of being given parliamentary approval in 2018, plans have been delayed by authorized challenges and the COVID pandemic.
Why is it controversial?
Environmental teams have campaigned towards the enlargement for the reason that plans have been drawn up.
Final week, Jenny Bates, transport campaigner at Buddies of the Earth, known as the proposal for one more runway at Heathrow “hugely irresponsible in the midst of a climate emergency”, whereas Alethea Warrington, from local weather charity Attainable, mentioned: “Approving airport expansions would be a catastrophic misstep for a government which claims to be a climate leader.”
It has had critics throughout politics through the years, together with from Labour’s London mayor Sadiq Khan, on the idea of the influence on air high quality, noise and net-zero targets.
Boris Johnson was a long-standing opponent of the plans, and promised to “lie down in front of those bulldozers and stop construction” when he was London mayor for the Conservatives – although he toned down his rhetoric as soon as he was prime minister.
One of many louder critics has been Ed Miliband, who threatened to resign from Gordon Brown’s cupboard over the plans in 2009 when he was power and local weather change secretary.
In 2018, he mentioned an enlargement was “very likely” to make air air pollution worse.
Mr Miliband, now web zero secretary, has mentioned he is not going to resign from the federal government if the enlargement goes forward, including that the federal government’s place is for any aviation enlargement to happen inside the UK’s carbon budgets, that are a part of plans to fulfill the nation’s 2050 goal of lowering emissions by 100% in contrast with 1990 ranges.
“We believe that we can meet our growth mission – our number one priority – and keep within carbon budgets and indeed that our clean energy mission is crucial and a central part of meeting our growth mission,” he mentioned final week.
“Far from them being in contradiction, they are absolutely complimentary.”
Different London airports additionally pushing for expansions
Gatwick and Luton airports are additionally hoping to increase within the close to future.
Datawrapper
This content material is supplied by Datawrapper, which can be utilizing cookies and different applied sciences.
To indicate you this content material, we want your permission to make use of cookies.
You should utilize the buttons under to amend your preferences to allow Datawrapper cookies or to permit these cookies simply as soon as.
You may change your settings at any time through the Privateness Choices.
Sadly now we have been unable to confirm if in case you have consented to Datawrapper cookies.
To view this content material you need to use the button under to permit Datawrapper cookies for this session solely.
Allow Cookies
Enable Cookies As soon as
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has a deadline of 27 February to decide on a second runway at Gatwick, which might successfully contain modifying an present taxiway.
Gatwick’s majority house owners, VINCI Airports, mentioned the £2.2bn challenge would create 14,000 jobs and generate £1bn a 12 months in financial advantages.
However Communities In opposition to Gatwick Noise and Emissions (CAGNE) insisted they might legally problem any second runway.
In the meantime, Luton Airport, owned by the native council in Bedfordshire, has utilized to construct a brand new terminal and requested for permission to extend its passenger numbers to 32 million a 12 months. It carried about 16.7 million in 2024.
Dr Alex Chapman, senior economist on the New Economics Basis (NEF), mentioned he believes the recommended progress advantages of UK airport enlargement do not stack up.
He added: “The massive climate damage caused by these schemes will create deep physical and economic hardship for millions and will wipe out any benefit from the government’s other climate policy efforts almost overnight.”
What has Rachel Reeves mentioned?
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
1:25
Reeves speaks to Sky Information about Heathrow at World Financial Discussion board
The chancellor dropped a heavy trace on Thursday on the World Financial Discussion board in Davos, Switzerland, that she intends to dismiss local weather issues and again Heathrow, Gatwick and Luton expansions as she mentioned “growth is the number one mission of this government”.
Requested straight if she would now put the runway, together with enlargement at Gatwick and Luton, forward of the UK’s web zero commitments, Ms Reeves mentioned: “I’m not going to comment on speculation, but what I would say is when the last government faced difficult decisions about whether to support infrastructure investment, the answer always seemed to be no.
“We will not keep it up like that, as a result of if we do, we are going to miss out on essential funding right here into Britain. You’ve got already seen quite a few selections, together with on Stansted and Metropolis Airport, on power tasks, on transport infrastructure as a result of we’re decided to develop the financial system.”
Conservative chief in favour of Heathrow enlargement
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
0:36
Badenoch backs Heathrow enlargement
“I’ve had to vote on this before, and I voted in support of the third runway,” Ms Badenoch, whose North West Essex constituency contains London Stansted Airport, mentioned.
“I know that it is very difficult for a lot of people when there’s an airport in your area. I know, because I’m the MP for an airport as well. I have never opposed growth or development.
“What I wish to do is be sure it is performed in the proper manner.”
Ms Badenoch added if the airport thinks it is able to deliver a third runway that meets all the criteria it has set, then we should “do the proper factor”.
“We’re speaking concerning the future,” she said, adding: “I feel that we have to be sure that we ship infrastructure. I voted for it earlier than, so why would I alter my thoughts?”
What has Heathrow mentioned?
A spokesperson for Heathrow wouldn’t touch upon reporting a few third runway, however mentioned “growing the economy means adding capacity at the UK’s hub airport which is full”.
