In accordance with Technique founder Michael Saylor, quantum computing gained’t break the Bitcoin community. As an alternative, the blockchain will merely “upgrade” in a tough fork.
This backwards-incompatible “upgrade,” he posted to X, will freeze quantum-vulnerable pay to public key (P2PK) outputs and provide extra bonuses of a diminished provide of bitcoin (BTC), greater safety, and a stronger community.
It will forestall Satoshi Nakamoto from spending his cash, and power a migration of nodes and miners to backwards-incompatible software program.
The Bitcoin Quantum Leap: Quantum computing gained’t break Bitcoin—it’s going to harden it. The community upgrades, energetic cash migrate, misplaced cash keep frozen. Safety goes up. Provide comes down. Bitcoin grows stronger.
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) December 16, 2025
Michael Saylor desires to switch BTC’s provide for quantum safety
“Looks like Saylor supports freezing Satoshi’s coins if quantum computers materialize,” somebody commented. “Lost coins do not stay frozen, they get stolen,” clarified one other.
“It’s so easy to call for freezing property when the property is not yours,” wrote one other, whereas one developer claimed, “Every single thing you mentioned here is extremely complex with colossal risk and externalities.”
Reactions to the proposal had been so unfavourable that some even clung to the hope that the submit was AI generated.
The specter of quantum computer systems forging BTC signatures is actual, albeit years if not a long time sooner or later.
As soon as giant, fault‑tolerant machines working Shor’s algorithm break an ECDSA logarithmic downside, that quantum pc may derive the personal key from sure P2PK public keys.
These embrace unspent transaction outputs belonging to Satoshi and Hal Finney from the earliest days of the Bitcoin ledger.
From then on, that non-public key could signal any transaction and spend all the BTC in its pockets.
