TAN and NAR have agreed to dismiss their lawsuit, in line with court docket paperwork filed on Monday. Nonetheless, Prime Agent Community can re-file fees or deliver the case to a different court docket sooner or later.
Whether or not it’s refining your small business mannequin, mastering new applied sciences, or discovering methods to capitalize on the subsequent market surge, Inman Join New York will put together you to take daring steps ahead. The Subsequent Chapter is about to start. Be a part of it. Be part of us and 1000’s of actual property leaders Jan. 22-24, 2025.
A lawsuit filed by the Prime Agent Community (TAN) in opposition to the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors (NAR) has been dismissed for a second time, in line with authorized filings.
As of Monday, TAN and NAR notified Decide Vince Chhabria that that they had agreed to dismiss the lawsuit with out prejudice. Every occasion will cowl their very own attorneys’ charges and bills, the submitting specified. The designation of “without prejudice” signifies that the plaintiff is allowed to re-file fees or deliver the case to a different court docket.
“The National Association of Realtors (NAR) and Top Agent Network (TAN) announce that they have reached an agreement under which TAN will dismiss its pending antitrust case against NAR without prejudice,” a joint assertion from TAN and NAR despatched to Inman mentioned.
“This pause will allow NAR to continue to deliberate the future of the Clear Cooperation Policy, including any possible interpretations or modifications.”
Requested whether or not any cash modified fingers between TAN and NAR as a part of a settlement or different settlement and whether or not TAN deliberate to re-file the swimsuit at a later date, TAN declined to remark.
TAN initially filed the lawsuit in Might 2020 to “stop NAR and its affiliates from conspiring to shut down competition, disrupt the relationship between real estate agents and their clients, and take away a family’s freedom to choose how to market their home for sale.”
The lawsuit was filed in response to NAR’s Clear Cooperation Coverage, which was adopted in Might 2020 and requires listings to be placed on the MLS inside 24 hours of being publicly marketed. Brokers from TAN argued that homesellers ought to have extra of a selection within the matter of placing their houses up on the MLS. This 12 months, the coverage has develop into extra contentious because the U.S. Division of Justice (DOJ) has continued to scrutinize NAR’s practices, and lots of actual property leaders have weighed in on whether or not or not the coverage ought to proceed as-is, be abolished or be amended.
“While most homesellers prefer to market through the MLS — which generally puts a listing before the most eyeballs the fastest — at any given time a significant percentage of consumers prefer not to do so,” an amended criticism filed in Oct. 2024 said.
“Many consumers wish to preserve their privacy and do not want to host viewings or have their property widely available for viewing on a listing website,” the criticism continues. “Other consumers engage in limited off-MLS marketing to ‘test the waters’ to determine the appropriate price for their home listing on the local MLS — MLSs retain listing data and overpricing a home on the MLS and failing to achieve a quick sale can lead to a lasting drop in the property’s value.”
The court docket initially dismissed the lawsuit in 2021 with prejudice, arguing that TAN was the improper plaintiff for such a lawsuit in opposition to NAR, for the reason that community’s enterprise mannequin in itself was allegedly anticompetitive.
TAN later appealed the ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court docket of Appeals. In 2023, the appeals court docket vacated the decrease court docket determination in ruling that allegations made in TAN’s lawsuit have been practically equal to allegations made in a lawsuit filed by the PLS.com — a lawsuit that had been allowed to maneuver ahead.
In December 2023, the lawsuit was reopened by Decide Chhabria and TAN filed a movement for reconsideration in Might 2024. Decide Chhabria granted that request in July 2024, stating that TAN had “adequately alleged antitrust injury.”
The San Francisco Affiliation of Realtors had been an unique defendant within the lawsuit, however in October 2024, TAN determined to focus its authorized battle on NAR and eliminated the San Francisco Affiliation of Realtors as a defendant.
The years’-long authorized battle ultimately seems to be resolved — no less than for now.
Inman Deputy Editor Andrea V. Brambila contributed reporting for this story.
Electronic mail Lillian Dickerson
