The daughter of Sir David Amess has mentioned the federal government’s resolution to reject a nationwide inquiry into his homicide is an “absolute insult” and “betrayal to our father’s memory”.
Katie Amess mentioned the loss of life of her father, who was murdered by Ali Harbi Ali in 2021, had left an “unimaginable void” in her life.
She mentioned the authorities had let her father down “so badly” and that his loss of life had been “brushed under the carpet”.
Politics newest: UK advising Ukraine on dealing with peace talks with the US
“Do not let his death be just another statistic.”
Sir David was stabbed to loss of life by Harbi Ali, an Islamic State (ISIS) supporter, throughout a constituency surgical procedure at a church corridor in Leigh-on-Sea on 15 October 2021.
The killer, who was given a whole-life sentence, had grow to be radicalised by ISIS propaganda and had been referred to the anti-terror programme Forestall earlier than the assault.
A overview into his homicide discovered that Harbi Ali was launched from the Forestall anti-terror programme “too quickly”, together with his case closed 5 years earlier than the assault following one assembly at a McDonald’s to cope with his interpretation of what’s forbidden underneath Islamic legislation.
The late MP’s daughter, who can also be taking authorized motion towards Essex Police and the House Workplace, has dismissed that investigation as “another useless paper review conducted by a person of their choice”.
In a tearful assertion, she accused Ms Cooper of getting “strung” the household alongside for “months” by suggesting she “was working on ways to help us”.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
1:43
‘No accountability over MP’s loss of life’ says daughter
She instructed reporters: “How can the government justify holding inquiries for other tragic events like Southport and Nottingham and yet refuse to investigate the very system that failed my father?
“Is his life value lower than others?
“Does our family not deserve the truth like other families and to know that what happened will never happen again?”
She mentioned all Ms Cooper had carried out was “remove the possibility of us being included in the Southport inquiry; instead offering another useless paper review, conducted by a person of their choice”.
In a direct message to the federal government, she mentioned: “I would like Sir Keir and Yvette Cooper to know precisely what the implications are when the very authorities businesses which might be set as much as shield folks like my dad, and members of the general public, fail.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
0:59
Forestall ‘launched MP’s killer too shortly’
“Doing paper review after paper review into what happened, like what they have done since the day my dad was murdered, is simply not enough.”
In it Ms Cooper mentioned it was “hard to see how an inquiry would be able to go beyond” terrorist killer Ali Harbi Ali’s trial and the just lately printed Forestall studying overview.
Outlining the federal government’s reasoning for refusing a public inquiry, safety minister Dan Jarvis mentioned he didn’t consider such a step would “unearth any information that has not already been assessed”.
“In the years since this cowardly attack, there have been several reviews asking how this could have been avoided, and we have seen significant improvements to the Prevent programme as well as stronger protections for MPs,” he mentioned.
“We understand that the Amess family are still looking for answers and we take this incredibly seriously.
“Whereas we don’t suppose a public inquiry would unearth any info that has not already been assessed, the house secretary has confirmed that we’ll additional scrutinise all of the opinions which have taken place over the previous few years.
“We very much hope this will help the family to get the justice they deserve.”
