QUESTION: Concerning Choose Hannah Dugan’s indictment, some are saying her defence is just like that of Donald Trump, and that is all political since she says she has absolute immunity. You’re the unbiased authorized supply. One lawyer pal stated, “Ask Armstrong, and you will hear the legal truth.” So what’s up with this?
GP
ANSWER: This county state decide of Wisconsin was correctly indicted for allegedly obstructing the arrest of a Mexican immigrant by federal US authorities. She has claimed that the costs needs to be dismissed as a result of she’s immune from prosecution for official acts. Her definition of a “legal act” is that she might kill her partner and declare immunity.
The legal case towards Dugan, which her lawyer claims “is virtually unprecedented and entirely unconstitutional,” is so absurd it’s laughable. She had no jurisdiction over that situation, and as a county decide, she swore an oath to the Federal Structure, which takes priority over her private views. She obstructed justice, making an attempt to forestall US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers from arresting Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who appeared in her courtroom on April 18th to face home battery costs. In keeping with the indictment, she escorted Flores-Ruiz out of the courtroom by means of a private exit to keep away from authorities. Flores-Ruiz, who ICE had focused for deportation, was detained outdoors the courthouse after a foot chase.
This isn’t even remotely associated to the allegations of Trump commenting on the election as president. That’s inside the scope of his place. What he’s alleged to have carried out was not an official act by any stretch of the creativeness. She is an activist decide who disagrees with federal legislation however has no judicial energy to bypass that legislation. She had no jurisdiction over the ICE situation, which is in a federal courtroom, not an area county courtroom. If I had been within the grand jury, I might have indicted her with out query. There is no such thing as a justification in any respect for her actions, and there’s no declare that that is an official act for which she has immunity.