A report into a possible “second Post Office IT scandal” has discovered it’s “a reasonable likelihood” that Seize software program “created shortfalls” for sub-postmasters previous to the Horizon scandal.
The system, which was the predecessor to Horizon, was rolled out to branches from 1993 onwards.
At the least 40 former sub-postmasters declare they have been falsely accused of stealing because of “glitches” in Seize.
Lots of of sub-postmasters have been wrongfully convicted, as a part of the Horizon scandal, between 1999 and 2015 due to inaccurate shortfalls.
The unbiased report into Seize by Kroll, a threat advisory and monetary options firm, concluded it was “a reasonable likelihood that Capture could have created shortfalls for sub postmasters”.
Kroll has not made any conclusions in regards to the security of prison convictions.
It did discover that 13.5% of all branches might have been utilizing Seize.
The report additionally found that sub-postmasters mentioned that community managers and space managers pressured them to make use of the system.
It mentioned that authorized investigation groups weren’t wanting on the query of “bugs or errors” within the system on the time.
Kroll additionally questioned the Seize Helpdesk remit and effectiveness.
Picture:
Seize software program predates the defective Horizon system
A gaggle of sub-postmasters submitted materials, together with floppy disks containing the software program, to investigators.
They claimed that errors occurred when upgrades have been made to Seize, and energy cuts have been additionally one other doable purpose for faults.
Lord Beamish, previously MP Kevan Jones, was on the report briefing assembly and mentioned he believes that information on Seize “do exist”.
“I think some more digging needs to be done at the Post Office,” he mentioned. “I wouldn’t trust the Post Office as far as I can spit.”
He described it as a “copycat” of the Horizon scandal.
‘A flawed system which was destroying lives’
He mentioned: “Like Horizon, it was a flawed system which was destroying lives whilst officials repeatedly ignored the evidence playing out in front of their eyes.”
The unbiased evaluate has solely taken place “as a result of the bravery, determination and resilience of those affected, who came forward to speak about what had happened to them, and ultimately would not let injustice go unchallenged”, he added.
Mr Hudgell is looking for “fast action on these failings” together with the creation of a compensation scheme to permit folks to “seek speedy settlements, or to further investigate their own individual cases”.
“It should never have needed such a long, hard battle to reach this stage, and there now must not be a long, hard battle ahead for exoneration and compensation,” he mentioned. “As we’ve seen this 12 months, new laws may be fast-tracked and launched to overturn unsafe convictions and clear peoples’ names.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
2:46
Sub-postmasters beforehand raised parallels between Seize and Horizon
Steve Marston, 68, says he was wrongly convicted of theft and false accounting after errors brought on by Seize accounting software program.
Auditors discovered shortfalls of £79,000 at his department in Better Manchester in 1998 – he subsequently pleaded responsible to theft and false accounting.
He mentioned Seize “was totally unfit for use and should never have been released”.
He claims that sub-postmasters have been informed that “[the software] would make our lives easier and that we would no longer have to do manual accounting as we had in the past”.
He says he was given Seize by the Publish Workplace “and basically left to get on with it without any sort of guidance”.
One other Seize sufferer, Steve Lewis, misplaced his job in 2000 after elevating issues about shortfalls and Seize software program glitches.
“I’ve always been looked on as being the man who robbed the post office,” he mentioned.
“I lost my post office, the commercial buildings that I had moved my office to, and was forced to sell my family home.”
Mr Lewis claims he was warned “not to be a troublemaker” and informed the problems have been solely taking place to him.
It wasn’t till he watched the TV drama, Mr Bates Vs The Publish Workplace, that he “realised” similarities between Horizon victims and himself equivalent to “unexplained losses”.
In January, the federal government ordered the Publish Workplace to analyze the claims associated to Seize.
