Sir Alan Bates has accused the federal government of presiding over a “quasi kangaroo court” for Submit Workplace compensation.
Writing in The Sunday Instances, the campaigner, who led a years-long effort for justice for sub-postmasters, revealed he had been given a “take it or leave it” provide that was lower than half of his unique declare.
“The sub-postmaster compensation schemes have been turned into quasi-kangaroo courts in which the Department for Business and Trade sits in judgement of the claims and alters the goal posts as and when it chooses,” he stated.
“Claims are, and have been, knocked back on the basis that legally you would not be able to make them, or that the parameters of the scheme do not extend to certain items.”
Greater than 900 sub-postmasters have been prosecuted between 1999 and 2015 after defective Horizon accounting software program made it look as if cash was lacking from their accounts.
Many are nonetheless ready for compensation regardless of the earlier authorities saying those that had their convictions quashed have been eligible for £600,000 payouts.
6:36
‘It nonetheless provides me nightmares’
After the Submit Workplace terminated his contract over a false shortfall in 2003, Sir Alan started looking for out different sub-postmasters and finally took the Submit Workplace to courtroom.
Extra on Submit Workplace Scandal
A bunch litigation order (GLO) scheme was set as much as obtain redress for 555 claimants who took the Submit Workplace to the Excessive Courtroom between 2017 and 2019.
Sir Alan, who was portrayed by actor Toby Jones in ITV drama Mr Bates Vs The Submit Workplace, has referred to as for an impartial physique to be created to ship compensation.
He added that guarantees the compensation schemes could be “non-legalistic” had turned out to be “worthless”.
It’s understood round 80% of postmasters in Sir Alan’s group have accepted a full and ultimate redress, or been paid most of their provide.
0:29
‘Lives have been destroyed’
“We recognise there will be an absence of evidence given the length of time which has passed, and we therefore aim to give the benefit of the doubt to postmasters as far as possible.
“Anybody sad with their provide can have their case reviewed by a panel of specialists, which is impartial of the federal government.”