Sir Keir Starmer ought to have reassured and defined his immigration coverage to a senior Welsh MP somewhat than telling her “you’re rubbish”, Labour peer Harriet Harman mentioned.
Chatting with Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Harriet Harman criticised the prime minister for telling Plaid Cymru Westminster chief Liz Saville Roberts throughout PMQs “she talks rubbish” after she known as him out for utilizing “island of strangers” in his immigration speech on Monday.
Baroness Harman mentioned: “He should have actually explained ‘look, this is what we’re getting at. We’re it’s a communitarian message, it’s about neighbourliness, it’s about integration’.
“And he ought to have carried out that and reassured her and defined somewhat than simply slapping her down.
“I just think to call across the chamber, ‘you’re rubbish’ – I think a prime minister has the opportunity to be a bit more magisterial in that.”
She mentioned she has “been that woman standing there asking the prime minister a heartfelt and serious question, and had the prime minister say, ‘you’re rubbish'”.
2:42
Starmer’s speech divides opinion
Baroness Harman added: “I sort of went ‘ouch’ at that time, as a result of I have been in that scenario myself.
“I think people do want an explanation and he’s got an explanation and he should have done that rather than hit at the messenger.”
After Sir Keir used the phrase “island of strangers” whereas saying a crackdown on immigration, fellow Labour MPs, companies and trade reacted angrily.
The rhetoric was likened by some critics to Enoch Powell’s rivers of blood speech.
Forward of PMQs on Wednesday, Cupboard Workplace minister Pat McFadden tried to maneuver the controversy away from Sir Keir’s controversial remarks.
“Immigration has contributed a huge amount to the UK, it will in the future, I think the public want a sense of rules around it, that is what the prime minister was speaking about.”
He mentioned the row was “overblown” and he would possibly use the “island of strangers” phrase “depending on the context”.