Sir Keir Stamer made a mistake by labelling Reform UK’s migration coverage racist, a Labour Occasion grandee has stated.
The Labour Occasion convention was dominated by discussions about Nigel Farage and Reform UK, and the way in which to struggle off their surge within the polls.
👉 Click on right here to hearken to Electoral Dysfunction in your podcast app 👈
Spotify
This content material is supplied by Spotify, which can be utilizing cookies and different applied sciences.
To indicate you this content material, we want your permission to make use of cookies.
You should utilize the buttons beneath to amend your preferences to allow Spotify cookies or to permit these cookies simply as soon as.
You may change your settings at any time through the Privateness Choices.
Sadly now we have been unable to confirm when you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content material you should use the button beneath to permit Spotify cookies for this session solely.
Allow Cookies
Permit Cookies As soon as
Chatting with the BBC final Sunday, the prime minister stated Reform’s plans to require settled immigrants to use for British citizenship or face deportation was a “racist policy”.
Nonetheless, he and different cupboard ministers declined to name Mr Farage, Reform UK or their supporters racist in subsequent interviews.
2:09
Starmer vs Farage: Ought to he have stated ‘racist’?
Dame Harriet stated: “So I think in a way, what happened is he made that without planning it – he said the racist thing.
“After which as a substitute of simply going again on it, he barely doubled down.”
Requested by Rigby if it was a mistake, Dame Harriet says that the prime minister ought to have “just moved on and redefined it rather than trying to explain it”.
“You can’t distinguish between a racist policy from a party and a racist party leader because that’s too subtle and nuanced for the public,” she added.
0:45
Nigel Farage has hit out at PM
Pushed by Rigby on if it was a mistake to make use of the phrase racist, Dame Harriet stated “yeah”.
She added: “It doesn’t work well.
“I feel it is a lot better to take issues on as divisive somewhat than label the particular person, to label somebody – that is the type of finish of a dialog.
“I think you have to be explaining why it’s wrong, why it’s harmful, why it’s problematic.”

