The Submit Workplace was a “mess” run by executives and authorities appointees who “dragged their feet” in efforts to compensate and exonerate sub-postmasters, the previous chairman has advised the general public inquiry.
Henry Staunton, who was sacked after 14 months as chair by then enterprise secretary Kemi Badenoch in January, additionally accused the organisation of getting a “huge cultural problem” with an absence of ethnic and gender range – and of overseeing “vindictive” investigations into two sub-postmasters who served on the corporate board.
He additionally denied allegations that he made racist and misogynistic feedback about Submit Workplace colleagues, saying he had been “deeply stung” by an inside investigation he says was used as a pretext by Ms Badenoch to take away him.
A former chairman of WH Smith and director of ITV, Mr Staunton was appointed in December 2022 after being approached by headhunters who advised him he could be “giving something back” if he took the job.
Cash newest: Extreme? How UK maternity pay charges examine globally
He stated he discovered a tradition of chaos in senior administration that instantly required greater than the 2 days per week he had been advised was required.
“The place was a mess that required more of my time,” he stated. His view was that executives didn’t absolutely settle for the findings of the Excessive Courtroom judgment that established the position of the Horizon pc system in a whole lot of flawed prosecutions.
Extra on Submit Workplace Scandal
“My initial impression was that the Post Office and government were dragging their feet in terms of making payments for remediation – in the first place – and in the second place I thought that there was no appetite at all for exoneration,” he advised the inquiry.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
2:13
New Submit Workplace scandal: ‘It has been horrific’
Mr Staunton stated that originally a “ridiculous” quantity of his time was taken up with requests for a pay rise from chief government Nick Learn, who he beforehand advised a Parliamentary inquiry was sad and threatening to resign.
In November 2022, earlier than he was formally in publish, he was requested to signal a letter to the secretary of state recommending a rise from the utmost of £788,500 to £1.125m, a “massive” enhance that Mr Staunton stated the minister was proper to reject.
He stated the atmosphere amongst senior employees was characterised by “risk aversion and paralysis” and “a culture of fear and worry”, partly as a result of executives feared being referred to as to provide proof to the general public inquiry.
Picture:
Nick Learn. Pic: Home of Commons/PA
Referring to a letter he acquired from an nameless whistleblower, that alleged a “disgusting culture” on the Submit Workplace, Mr Staunton agreed the organisation “had a huge problem with culture”.
“Ethnicity was very poorly represented. We did have a problem with ethnicity. We did have a problem with gender.”
He additionally recognised claims that Mr Learn had referred to, of these with a “public school education”, and that there was a notion of “jobs for the boys”.
Mr Staunton was additionally extremely vital of an inside investigation launched into two sub-postmasters who had been appointed to the board as non-executive administrators, alleging it was held open for months as a way of intimidating them.
Inquiry hears recording of chair’s sacking
The inquiry additionally heard particulars of Mr Staunton’s dismissal and was performed a recording of the phone name by which Ms Badenoch advised him he was being eliminated due to “complaints that are so serious the government needs to intervene”.
He was not advised on that decision what the complaints have been, however the earlier month had discovered his conduct was being examined as a part of a Submit Workplace investigation primarily based initially on an 80-page grievance in opposition to Mr Learn by the then chief folks officer. Within the grievance, Mr Staunton was talked about solely as soon as and never by identify.
Picture:
Then Enterprise Secretary Kemi Badenoch sacked Mr Staunton final yr. Pic: James Manning/PA Wire
The allegation in opposition to him was that he made inappropriate feedback about gender and race at a gathering about candidates to chair the Submit Workplace remuneration committee. In his witness assertion to the inquiry, he stated: “I deny those allegations completely and feel deeply stung by them.”
He advised the inquiry that three former Submit Workplace colleagues – one Jewish, one Muslim and one black – had supplied letters of help in his defence to questions from the Institute of Chartered Accountants.
“All three directors have said they thought there was not an ounce of racism in me and indeed I was a champion of greater diversity of ethnicity and gender on the board,” he stated.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
2:05
Sir Alan Bates threatens authorized motion
In his witness assertion, he stated particulars of the investigation and its findings in opposition to him, which have by no means been printed, have been leaked to the media by a authorities supply who claimed they defined why he objected to being sacked by a minister who was “black and female.”
“I was deeply aggrieved at being made a fall guy for failings that I myself had been struggling to get the Post Office to address,” he stated.
“This was a report into Nick Read, not about me, but because I had taken the side of the sub-postmasters it was weaponised against me.”
