In Soviet instances, Western observers would scrutinise video footage of state events, like army parades on Purple Sq., to attempt to study extra about Kremlin hierarchy.
Who was positioned closest to the chief? What did the physique language say? Which officers had been out and in of favour?
In some methods, not a lot has modified.
The footage present-day Kremlinologists are at present pouring over is from Wednesday’s landmark assembly of Russia’s Safety Council, through which Vladimir Putin advised his high officers to start out drafting proposals for a potential nuclear weapons take a look at.
It was an vital second. Not one you’d count on a trusted lieutenant to overlook. However Sergei Lavrov, Russia’s veteran overseas minister, was conspicuously absent – the one everlasting member of the Council not current.
In line with the Russian enterprise every day, Kommersant, his absence was “coordinated”.
Picture:
US President Donald Trump meets with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Pic: AP

Picture:
Sergey Lavrov and Marco Rubio in Alaska. Pic: AP
That episode alone would have been sufficient to boost eyebrows.
However coupled with the number of a extra junior official to steer the Russian delegation on the upcoming G20 summit (a job Lavrov has stuffed in recent times) – effectively, that is when questions get requested, specifically: Has Moscow’s high diplomat been sidelined?
The query has grown loud sufficient to pressure the Kremlin right into a denial, but it surely’s carried out little to quell hypothesis that Lavrov has fallen out of favour.

Picture:
Lavrov has successfully been Putin’s right-hand man for many years. Pic: Sputnik by way of Reuters
Rumours of a rift have been mounting since Donald Trump known as off a deliberate summit with Putin in Budapest final month, following a telephone name between Lavrov and US secretary of state Marco Rubio.
In line with the Monetary Occasions, it was Lavrov’s uncompromising stance that prompted the White Home to place the summit on ice.
Conversations I had with diplomatic sources right here on the time revealed a perception that Lavrov had both dropped the ball or gone off-script. Whether or not it was accidentally or by design, his diplomacy (or lack of it) torpedoed the summit and seemingly set again a US-Russia rapprochement.
2:19
September: Anybody downing plane in Russian airspace will ‘remorse it’
That might’ve angered Putin, who’s eager to have interaction with Washington, not solely on Ukraine however on different points, like nuclear arms management.
Extra importantly, maybe, it made the Russian president seem weak – unable to regulate his overseas minister. And Putin is just not a person who likes to be undermined.
Soccer followers will probably be conversant in Sir Alex Ferguson’s golden rule of administration: By no means let a participant develop greater than the membership. Putin operates in a similar way. Loyalty is valued extraordinarily extremely.

Picture:
Lavrov meets along with his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif in 2015. Pic: Reuters

Picture:
North Korea’s Kim Jong Un and Lavrov meet in Pyongyang in 2023. Pic: AP

Picture:
Lavrov and Chinese language counterpart Wang Yi meet in Indonesia in 2022. Pic: Reuters
If Lavrov has certainly been sidelined, it will be a really vital second certainly. The 75-year-old has been the face of Russian diplomacy for greater than twenty years and successfully Putin’s right-hand man for a lot of the Kremlin chief’s rule.
Recognized for his abrasive type and acerbic putdowns, Lavrov has additionally been a vociferous cheerleader for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
On the Putin-Trump summit in Alaska, he arrived sporting a jumper emblazoned with the initials “CCCP”, the Russian letters for USSR. The obvious message: Ukraine nonetheless belongs to Moscow.
And within the melee that instantly adopted the presidents’ press statements on the summit, I bear in mind racing over to Lavrov as he was leaving and yelling a query to him by the road of safety guards.
He did not even flip. As a substitute, he simply shouted again: “Who are you?”
It was typical of a diplomatic heavyweight, who’s recognized for not pulling his punches. However has that uncompromising strategy lastly taken its toll?

