This report is accessible solely to subscribers of Inman Intel, the information and analysis arm of Inman providing deep insights and market intelligence on the enterprise of residential actual property and proptech. Subscribe at present.
It’s essentially the most contentious U.S. presidential election cycle in current reminiscence — and the brokerage world just isn’t immune from its impression.
As Intel examined final week, actual property brokers have been tiptoeing round uncomfortable political matters with a few of their purchasers.
However a brand new survey of three,000 U.S. shoppers in early October reveals the ways in which supporters of the 2 main presidential candidates — Donald Trump and Kamala Harris — generally strategy the homebuying course of by way of distinctive lenses.
The most recent Inman-Dig Insights client survey means that in Harris supporters, brokers are discovering purchasers who’re extra prepared to belief brokers and to take a conventional strategy to itemizing their properties on the market. In the meantime, purchasers who’re inclined to assist Trump are generally a bit extra reluctant to take an agent’s recommendation, whilst they largely nonetheless find yourself on the identical web page.
Intel drills deep this week with breakdowns of energetic homebuyers and sellers, seemingly near-future patrons, and U.S. shoppers broadly.
The evaluation sheds mild on client attitudes on the NAR settlement, fee negotiation practices, and what’s bringing patrons to the market at present within the first place.
See how Trump supporters and Harris supporters are approaching the market otherwise at present — and the numerous areas they’ve in widespread — within the full report.
Incomes belief on the margins
In Intel’s month-to-month surveys of actual property professionals, brokerage leaders routinely say they suppose purchasers have a low opinion of actual property brokers proper now.
However when Intel surveys working-age U.S. adults throughout the nation, they report the precise reverse.
Clear majorities of each Harris supporters and Trump supporters report having a optimistic opinion of actual property brokers, with fewer than 1 in 10 members of both group reporting they’ve a detrimental impression of brokers general.
That stated, supporters of the Republican presidential ticket have been a bit extra more likely to have an ambivalent and even detrimental angle towards brokers than their Democratic counterparts.
And so they’re much less more likely to say their esteem of brokers has improved over the previous 12 months.
42 % of Harris supporters say their opinion of actual property brokers has improved over the previous 12 months, with solely 7 % saying their opinion has worsened.
By comparability, 36 % of Trump supporters say they suppose extra extremely of brokers at present than they did a 12 months in the past, with 9 % saying their opinion has worsened.
This truth touches on a broader theme that emerged throughout a variety of questions on this survey: some Trump supporters are likelier to begin out with decrease belief for brokers and the system by which they function, and should take extra efforts to persuade consequently.
However brokers who put in that additional effort are more likely to break by way of with their purchasers, the survey outcomes recommend.
The artwork of the deal
When requested concerning the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors’ proposed settlement, most Individuals say they nonetheless haven’t heard of it.
However Harris supporters in early October have been extra more likely to say they have been no less than loosely accustomed to the NAR deal — and extra more likely to consider the deal is nice for shoppers.
32 % of Harris supporters advised the survey that they have been conscious of a current settlement involving NAR. By comparability, 26 % of Trump supporters surveyed have been conscious of the settlement.
64 % of Harris supporters who stated they’d heard of the deal had the impression it was good for shoppers. Practically 59 % of Trump supporters who have been accustomed to the deal agreed with that concept.
Nonetheless, 11 % of Trump supporters with data of the NAR deal stated it was good for neither shoppers nor the actual property business. That’s in comparison with solely 5 % of Harris supporters who shared the identical skepticism towards the deal.
These outcomes replicate the opinions of the broader inhabitants, lots of whom will not be trying to transfer any time quickly, or could solely be beginning to contemplate a transfer just a few months down the road.
However the shoppers who have been energetic available on the market — and dealing with brokers — in early October have been far more engaged with the questions at hand.
An altered battlefield
Intel needed to know the way energetic patrons and sellers are navigating the modifications, and — as a matter of curiosity — how their approaches may be completely different based on their voting intention within the coming election.
Intel discovered proof that after they really hit the market, Harris-supporting purchasers are a bit extra deferential to the previous establishment — on each the client facet and the vendor facet.
And that begins with the fee charges that Harris supporters are agreeing to pay.
Trump supporters available on the market in early October have been extra more likely to report reaching a sub-2 % compensation price with their purchaser’s agent — however no extra more likely to say they achieved that by way of precise price negotiation.
25 % of Trump supporters stated they signed an settlement with their purchaser’s agent that pledged to pay near 1.5 % of the transaction or much less.
Solely 17 % of Harris supporters stated their purchaser’s agent settlement had a compensation price that low.
This was not essentially as a consequence of Trump supporters driving a harder negotiation, nevertheless.
19 % of Trump supporters stated they efficiently negotiated their purchaser’s agent payment down from the next quantity — virtually precisely as many Harris supporters who stated the identical.
However which will change as extra purchasers change into accustomed to the brand new panorama.
Extra Republicans stated they weren’t conscious that their purchaser’s agent payment was negotiable earlier than signing the settlement — 35 % of Trump supporters vs. solely 29 % amongst Harris supporters.
So if it’s not a negotiation query, then why are extra Trump supporters paying decrease fee charges?
It’s tough to say for certain. There could also be different elements the survey didn’t ask about — equivalent to market-specific or brokerage-specific concerns, and even sampling points within the survey itself — that assist clarify the hole on the client facet.
The survey revealed variations between the 2 teams on the vendor facet as nicely.
Harris supporters who’re itemizing a house have been considerably extra more likely to take a strictly conventional strategy to their itemizing — agreeing up entrance to cowl the agent payment for any purchaser who purchases their house.
50 % of Harris supporters stated they have been taking this conventional strategy to their itemizing, in comparison with 41 % of Trump supporters who stated the identical.
As an alternative, Trump supporters have been a bit extra more likely to say they have been withholding the client’s agent payment up entrance as a negotiating tactic, however that they might be prepared to cowl it ultimately.
They have been additionally a bit extra more likely to take a agency stance towards protecting the payment.
And — as seen in response to different settlement-related questions — extra Trump supporters stated that they have been unaware of the brand new choices.
The first drivers
Lastly, Intel explored why individuals who have plans to maneuver within the coming months are contemplating taking this step.
Once more, the 2 teams shared a lot in widespread when it got here to their prime causes for shifting. However some distinct variations did emerge within the responses.
Trump supporters usually tend to say they’re shifting as a result of…
…they’re anticipating, or planning to have, a baby — Seemingly patrons who assist Trump have been extra more likely to say they have been trying to purchase a house associated to having a baby. Greater than 16 % of Trump supporters named this as their purpose for doubtlessly shopping for, in comparison with fewer than 12 % of Harris supporters who stated the identical.
Harris supporters usually tend to say they’re shifting as a result of…
…they’re drawn to the monetary advantages of homeownership — 28 % of Harris supporters gave this purpose, in comparison with 22 % of Trump supporters who stated the identical.
…they’re searching for a greater college district — 14 % of Harris supporters stated they have been motivated by higher faculties, in comparison with 11 % of pro-Trump shoppers.
…they need to transfer nearer to household — 30 % of Harris supporters chosen this feature, narrowly edging out the 27 % of Trump supporters who stated the identical.
Taken collectively, it’s clear that Trump supporters and Harris supporters have a lot in widespread, no less than in terms of how they strategy the housing market.
However by bringing purchasers on top of things and incomes belief the place some are skeptical, brokers could possibly bridge gaps the place they exist in a polarized — and continuously evolving — actual property surroundings.
Concerning the Inman-Dig Insights client survey
The Inman-Dig Insights client survey was carried out from Oct. 4-6, 2024, to gauge the opinions and behaviors of Individuals associated to homebuying.
The survey sampled a various group of three,000 American adults, ranging in age from 24 to 65 and employed both full-time or part-time. The members have been chosen to supply a broadly consultant breakdown by age, gender and area.
Statistical rigor was maintained all through the examine, and the outcomes needs to be largely consultant of attitudes held by U.S. adults on this age group with full- or part-time jobs. Each Inman and Dig Insights are majority-owned by Toronto-based Beringer Capital.
E mail Daniel Houston
