LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) – Fifteen Michiganders accused of performing as faux electors for Donald Trump following the 2020 election had all felony costs dismissed from the Ingham County Courtroom final week. Wednesday morning, a Home Oversight subcommittee met to listen to testimony from these concerned within the case.
The committee heard testimony from a few of the protection attorneys who argued that the case was a weaponization of presidency.
(WLNS)
“This was not some type of hidden or clandestine plot hatched in the shadows. It was a transparent, precautionary measure rooted in historical precedent,” mentioned lawyer Kevin Kijewski.
Kijewski was one among many protection attorneys for the accused faux electors.
“The Republican certificate was a legal nullity. It could never expose anyone to loss or create a liability, and it had no potential to alter the electoral outcome,” mentioned Kijewski.
Kijewski claims the costs introduced by Michigan Legal professional Common Dana Nessel had been a “calculated political strike.”
“This wasn’t about evidence. It was about messaging to her base,” mentioned Kijewski. “This case exemplifies how attorney general Nessel has abused her office to target Republicans, erode public trust in the judicial system, and advanced a partisan agenda.”
Kijewski says the accused believed they’d the precise to hunt redress of grievances, citing the primary modification and that none of them had intentions to deceive or defraud.
(WLNS)
“Prosecutors have complete immunity but there needs to be some sort of line where a prosecutor can be held personally responsible,” mentioned protection lawyer Nicholas Somberg.
Somberg echoed Kijewski factors, saying modifications should be made to legal guidelines concerning abuse of course of and prosecutor accountability.
“It has been claimed that these costs had been vindictive or political, and i’ll say this, nothing may be farther from the fact,“ AG Nessel mentioned after the preliminary dismissal of costs.
6 Information reached out to the AG for response to Wednesday’s listening to, and obtained the next assertion.
“While my office reviews a potential appeal of the District Court’s opinion in this matter, I find it important following today’s demonstration to note that, at no point has any judge or jury found these defendants not guilty. Plainly, none of these defendants have ever even denied the conduct supporting these criminal charges— that they signed the fraudulent certificate of electors. The Court claimed, instead, that these defendants were insufficiently ‘savvy or sophisticated enough’ to understand the electoral process, to understand their role in this plot to overturn the 2020 election. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and neither is just plain ignorance.”
