Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of failing to ensure the lately introduced uplift in defence spending won’t be spent on the contentious Chagos Islands deal.
After initially refusing to set out a timeline to extend defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, the prime minister confirmed on Tuesday the brink could be met by 2027, with an ambition to achieve 3% within the subsequent parliament.
The transfer has been funded by a reduce within the overseas support finances from 0.5% of GDP to 0.3%, which the federal government says will launch £13.4bn yearly for defence – though consultants say the determine is nearer to half that, at £6bn.
Regardless of the transfer being welcomed by the principle opposition events, there have been questions as as to if the uptick in spending might be used to fund the Chagos deal, which might switch the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius after a decades-long dispute.
Politics newest: Badenoch takes credit score for defence plan
The settlement contains the tropical atoll of Diego Garcia, residence to a UK-US army base that performs an important position within the area’s stability and worldwide safety.
Underneath the proposed settlement, the UK would lease again Diego Garcia for 99 years at a reported annual price of round £90m.
Though the Biden administration welcomed the deal as a “win for diplomacy”, Donald Trump’s White Home has expressed reservations concerning the deal owing to its considerations over China’s affect in Mauritius.
Throughout Prime Minister’s Questions, Tory chief Kemi Badenoch requested whether or not the rise in defence spending could be used to fund the Chagos deal.
“This morning the defence secretary could not say if the Chagos deal would come out of the defence budget,” she mentioned.
“Can he confirm to the House that none of the defence uplift includes payments for his Chagos deal?”
The prime minister replied: “The additional spend I announced yesterday is for our capability on defence and security in Europe, as I made absolutely clear yesterday.
“The Chagos deal is extraordinarily necessary for our safety, for US safety. The US are rightly taking a look at it. When it is finalised I will put it earlier than the Home with the costings.”
He said “the figures being bandied round” were “completely broad of the mark”, adding: “The deal is nicely over a century however the funding I introduced yesterday is for {our capability} to place ourselves able to rise to a generational problem, that’s what that cash is all about and I assumed she supported it.”
Later, Downing Avenue didn’t rule out that cash from elevated defence spending might be used as a part of the Chagos deal.
Requested about Sir Keir’s response to questions on whether or not any of the brand new cash might be spent on the deal, the prime minister’s official spokesman mentioned: “The uplift announced yesterday will be going on our military capabilities, technology, adopting cutting-edge capabilities that are vital to retain a decisive edge as threats rapidly evolve”.
He later added: “We’ll obviously present the details of the Chagos deal as and when it’s finalised.”
Consultants have questioned the £13.4bn determine utilized by the federal government, arguing {that a} 0.2% improve amounted to an additional £6bn in money phrases.
Ben Zaranko, affiliate director on the Institute for Fiscal Research, mentioned the prime minister “followed in the steps of the last government by announcing a misleadingly large figure for the ‘extra’ defence spending this announcement entails”.
“An extra 0.2% of GDP is around £6bn, and this is the size of the cut to the aid budget. Yet he trumpeted a £13bn increase in defence spending.
“It is arduous to make sure with out extra element from the Treasury, however this determine solely appears to make sense if one thinks the defence finances would in any other case have been frozen in money phrases.”
