Is historical past about to repeat itself, 50 years after the final time a Labour chancellor raised the fundamental fee of earnings tax?
Now that Rachel Reeves has dumped Labour’s election pledge to not enhance nationwide insurance coverage, earnings tax or VAT, she’s tipped to boost earnings tax by 2p on 26 November.
Politics Hub: Newest updates and evaluation
Again in 1975, Labour’s chancellor, the outdated bruiser Denis Healey, did simply that, although again then the fundamental fee of earnings tax was 33%, and he elevated it to 35%.
Picture:
Denis Healey within the Treasury. Pic: PA
Loads of parallels…
It is claimed there are similarities between the state of UK politics and the financial system in 1975 and immediately. Labour had received a normal election the yr earlier than, as an example.
Healey claimed he’d inherited an financial system in a multitude from Edward Heath’s Conservative authorities. Sound acquainted?
His spending cuts have been seen as a U-turn and triggered an indignant backlash from left-wing Labour MPs. Sound acquainted?
In 1975, the Conservatives had a brand new chief – a girl, for the primary time – in Margaret Thatcher, who even her supporters admit, struggled in her first yr. Sound acquainted?
Within the 70s, Healey introduced he was reviewing the choices for a wealth tax, simply as Reeves has been urged to, by former Labour chief Neil Kinnock and union leaders.
And simply because the Tories declare increased taxes will set off a mind drain in 2025, Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones had left for France in 1971 and David Bowie moved to Switzerland in 1976.
A phrase typically attributed to Healey was that he wished to “squeeze the rich until the pips squeak”. Actually, what he stated, in 1974, was that he “wanted to squeeze property speculators until the pips squeak”.
Picture:
Margaret Thatcher in 1987. Pic: AP
…however it might be worse!
However earlier than we get too depressed about 26 November, the financial system was in a a lot worse state within the Nineteen Seventies, with inflation heading in direction of 25%, unemployment rising and the pound falling. It was known as “stagflation”.
Again then, the world was reeling from a world disaster created by a large rise in oil costs, although a public sector spending spree, with large pay settlements received by the unions, did not assist.
“The budget I have presented today is a hard one for all of us in Britain,” Healey concluded on the finish of his horror finances. “It is dictated by the harsh reality of the world we live in.
“A extreme finances is a needed ingredient in any technique for bettering the general efficiency of our financial system, which has been lagging more and more behind most industrial economies for greater than a single technology.”
Responding, the new Tory leader at the time, Margaret Thatcher, taunted foreign secretary James Callaghan for “muttering away” and concluded: “I bear in mind him making a finances speech wherein he summed up his finances as, ‘regular as she goes’.
“The present chancellor of the exchequer seemed to be saying that this one was, ‘steady as she sinks’.” Nicely, humour wasn’t her strongest swimsuit.
Nowadays inflation is a mere 3.8%, though that is practically double the Financial institution of England’s 2% goal, because the shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride identified after the most recent figures.
“Combined with her £25bn jobs tax, Rachel Reeves is pushing inflation higher and higher,” Sir Mel declared. “Starmer and Reeves do not have the backbone to sort this mess out.”
Picture:
The chancellor will ship her finances on 26 November. Pic: PA
Sir Keir Starmer spelt out the place he claims the blame lies for “tough but fair decisions” in 2025 when he addressed Labour MPs – reported to be “grim-faced” as they listened – on Monday night.
“It’s becoming clearer that the long-term impact of Tory austerity, their botched Brexit deal and the pandemic on Britain’s productivity is worse than even we feared,” he stated.
Ah sure, Tory austerity, Brexit, and the pandemic, they’re what has brought on the £20bn (or is it £30bn?) black gap within the public funds, based on the PM.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
2:25
Can the Tories be blamed for the monetary black gap?
Does historical past inform us what may occur subsequent?
Healey’s budgets did not finish nicely for Labour. He was compelled to go cap in hand to the Worldwide Financial Fund for a bail-out in 1976 and Labour misplaced the 1979 normal election to Thatcher.
Might one thing comparable occur once more? At the least the 1974-79 Harold Wilson-James Callaghan went full-term, though Callaghan was compelled right into a Lib-Lab pact to outlive.
This week Nigel Farage predicted the Starmer authorities will solely final two extra years. Wishful considering, little question, as he basks in a wholesome opinion ballot lead.
“My view is that in two budgets’ time the markets will actually force the chancellor into what will be a genuine austerity budget, at which point the left in the Labour Party won’t buy it,” he stated.
“And it’s why I still stand by my prediction that there will be a general election, caused by economic collapse that will happen in 2027.”
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
2:13
Rigby: Reeves speech ‘unprecedented’
In his 15 April finances in 1975, Healey did not simply elevate the fundamental fee of earnings tax. Different charges went up by two proportion factors as nicely. Solely the highest 83% fee – sure, 83%! – was left unchanged.
In his first finances, in March 1974, Healey had raised the fundamental fee of earnings tax charges from 30% to 33%, a brand new tax band at 38% was launched, and the highest fee elevated from 75% to 83%.
Extra was to return in 1975. In addition to the rise within the fundamental earnings tax fee, a 25% fee of VAT was utilized to “luxury goods”, reminiscent of electrical home equipment, cameras and jewelry, instead of the fundamental fee of 8%.
Obligation on bingo – massively common within the 70s – doubled to five%, meals subsidies have been lower, including 0.5p to the price of a loaf, and beer went up by 2p, wine by 24p and spirits by 64p.
Rachel Reeves’ finances on 26 November could not presumably be that painful, absolutely?
Might it?
